Thursday, July 3, 2008
But marking has its flip side. To avoid a claim of false marking, there must be, as an absolute floor, a reasonable belief that the product marked as "patent pending" is actually the subject of a legitimate patent application, that a product marked as "U.S. Patent _" is actually covered by claims of a validly issued and unexpired patent, that a mark with the (R) subscript is actually registered by the U.S. Federal government, and not by a state or foreign country.
Where this floor is not met, the penalties can be stiff. For false marking of a patent, a Federal statute imposes a fine of $500 per product, and the suit can be brought by anyone, even if you don't have a dispute with them. False marking can also constitute unfair competition and violation of trade laws.
In short, marking laws can be complex. To do it properly, the IP entrepreneur must make sure to toe the mark.
Patents and Copyrights derive directly from the United States Constitution. Our Founders wrote into the Constitution the Patents and Copyrights Clause which reads:
- "The Congress shall have Power ... To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;"
From that sprang the Patent Act and the Copyright Act, and all laws related to them.
Trademarks, however, were overlooked by our Founders, and are protected by the Constitution only indirectly, through the Commerce Clause, which reads:
- "The Congress shall have Power ... To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;"
From that authority, Congress ultimately created the Federal Lanham Act governing Federal trademark rights.